|
| THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA MS CLINIC
On November 21st the Globe and Mail and CTV W5 featured the story of an experimental diagnostic and surgical procedure for Multiple Sclerosis called chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI). Multiple Sclerosis is the leading cause of disability in Canada. Over 60,000 Canadians are affected by this disease and many are now wondering about the validity of this research. Many of us in the MS clinical and research community watched this story with great interest, but also with some natural skepticism as we have seen similar claims of potential causes and cures in the past. As MS clinicians and researchers at the University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health, our goal is to provide the best treatment that is safely available to our patients and to pursue research that could lead to improvements in their lives. With respect to the validity of CCSVI, the work recently published by Dr. Zamboni on the narrowing of the veins in the neck does suggest that this may be common in people with MS. We had been aware of this story in the MS research community prior to the news report and had been developing plans in collaboration with radiology (including interventional vascular specialists) and physics experts at the University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health to try and confirm the findings independently using a variety of imaging techniques. We need to determine how common this abnormality is and how easily it can be detected with routine tests available throughout our region. With the support of the MS Society of Canada we will investigate this as rapidly as possible. However, all research activities must go through a careful process of review by the Clinical Research Ethics Board at UBC as well as Vancouver Coastal Health before anyone with MS can participate. This process can take several months. The news report also discussed an experimental treatment for correcting the narrowing of the veins using a catheter (a tube that goes into a blood vessel with a balloon attached to it). The people who were interviewed expressed that they dramatically improved after they were treated, and it is their enthusiasm that has really caused much of the excitement about this treatment. We must urge caution when reading these results as we believe that this part of Dr. Zamboni's experiment is not well controlled. By this we mean that all patients in his study were treated with the procedure. There was no group of patients who acted as control or untreated subjects. The reason for designing a study with a control group is to avoid bias and the placebo effect. Therefore, we believe that it is important to test the validity of this experimental treatment within a well designed study that avoids the potential influence of bias. Dr. Zamboni also agrees with this approach. We hope to work with other MS centers within Canada and worldwide. This type of study takes many months to organize, fund, and get underway, but it is the safest and only way to move forward and determine independently the value of treating CCSVI. Many questions remain unanswered. We hope the following list of questions and answers will help those of you with MS who want immediate information on this; however, some questions can only be answered with further testing, which we hope to get underway as soon as possible.
Frequently Asked Questions about CCSVI and MS
Q: Do these reports of a possible association between insufficient vein drainage and MS mean that MS is caused by venous insufficiency?
Q: If CCSVI turns out to be important in MS, can it be treated?
Q: I have MS. Should I be tested for signs of CCSVI?
Q: Should I get my veins tested at a private diagnostic facility?
Q: Can my MRI be checked for CCSVI?
Q: Does CCSVI make the standard treatments of MS meaningless?
Q: Are other Canadian centres performing routine testing or surgery for CCSVI?
Q: Will the MS Society of Canada fund research into CCSVI in MS?
Q: How can I support this work?
Q: Where can I get updates? Sincerely,
Anthony Traboulsee, MD
V. Devonshire, MD
Department of Medicine
|