Skip to main content

Main menu

  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Our Team
    • Vision, Mission and Values
    • Health and Economic Impact
    • Research Impact Video
    • Strategic Plan
  • Our Research
    • Research Focus
      • Brain Health
      • Cancer
      • Digital Health and Artificial Intelligence
      • Heart Health
      • Healthy Aging and Mobility
      • Immune System
      • Injury and Rehabilitation
      • Lung Health
      • Mental Health and Substance Use
    • Research Centres and Programs
      • BC Centre on Substance Use
      • Centre for Aging SMART
      • Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation
      • Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation
      • Centre for Lung Health
      • Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health
      • Immunity and Infection Research Centre
      • International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries
      • M. H. Mohseni Institute of Urologic Sciences
      • Ovarian Cancer Research Centre
      • Community Research Program
      • Emergency Medicine Research Program
      • Hematology Research Program
      • Skin Research Program
      • Other Research Focus Areas
    • News and Stories
    • Researcher Directory
    • Events and Workshops
  • Research Services
    • New to VCHRI
      • Working at VCHRI
      • Regulations and Training
      • Membership with VCHRI
      • Learning and Development
    • Starting Your Project
      • Research Facilitation
      • Awards and Funding
      • Grant Management
      • Operational Approval
      • CST Cerner
    • Developing Your Project
      • Clinical Trials Administration
      • Clinical Research Unit
      • Research Privacy
      • Financial Policies and Procedures
    • Additional Support
      • Indigenous Health Research Unit
      • VCH-VCHRI AI Hub
      • Communications and Media Relations
      • Study Recruitment Support
      • Innovation and Industry Partnership
    • Internal Awards
    • Clinical Research
    • Indigenous Research
  • Participate in Research
    • Reasons to Participate
    • Participant Stories
    • Find a Study
    • Recruitment Support

User menu

  • Log in

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Our Research
  3. News and Stories
  4. Air filter rebates for people in B.C. with asthma

Air filter rebates for people in B.C. with asthma

Stories Feb 23, 2024 4 minutes

Health outcomes simulation modelling suggests that a province-wide rebate program could be a cost-effective way to reduce asthma exacerbation from wildfires.

The rising number and intensity of wildfires in British Columbia are taking an immense toll on people and communities, prompting calls for further interventions to protect public health. Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute researcher Dr. Christopher Carlsten and his team applied advanced science in the field of health outcomes to assess the cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical B.C. government-administered rebate on air filters to reduce smoke-related asthma complications.

Published in the prestigious American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the model is designed to inform future public health discussions in the province.

Dr. Christopher Carlsten is director of Legacy for Airway Health and the Centre for Lung Health, professor and head of the Respiratory Medicine Division at the University of British Columbia (UBC). He is a Canada Research Chair in Occupational and Environmental Lung Disease and holds the Astra-Zeneca Chair in Occupational and Environmental Lung Disease at UBC. He is the director of the Air Pollution Exposure Laboratory, and also holds adjunct positions at the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies and the UBC School of Population and Public Health.

“Air filters are backed by research evidence as being highly effective at reducing air pollution in the home, such as from wildfire smoke,” states Carlsten. “The missing, big-picture question is: ‘What is the most economical way to get them into peoples’ hands?’”

"Wildfire smoke is a significant public health problem that is worsening. However, multiple factors can make it challenging to get a proven intervention to the people who need it.”  

Wildfire smoke contains fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns (PM2.5) — one millionth of a metre — or smaller. For comparison, a human hair is approximately 50 microns. These microscopic particles can travel deeper into the lungs, negatively impacting tissues. As a result, government health agencies often recommend that anyone with asthma or other health conditions that can worsen from fine particulate matter stay indoors during wildfire smoke events with elevated PM2.5.

Research into the long-term health outcomes of inhaling wildfire smoke is not well-established. However, short-term health implications for people with asthma, a chronic lung disease, may include increased respiratory symptoms or flare-ups, such as a worsening cough, wheezing, shortness of breath and decreased lung function, as well as other adverse health effects and hospitalizations. 

A 2021 Health Canada report classified fine particulate matter as one of three leading outdoor pollutants collectively responsible for 15,300 premature deaths in Canada annually and a cost of $114 billion to Canada’s economy.

“The existing evidence suggests that traffic-related air pollution has, overall, relatively greater effects on cardiovascular outcomes than lung effects. Conversely, emerging data on wildfire smoke inhalation suggests that the respiratory system may be impacted somewhat greater than the cardiovascular system,” states Carlsten. “It is important that we understand how to protect people from wildfire smoke since the same interventions used to reduce traffic pollution effects may not apply.”

The health and economic benefits of a B.C. rebate program on HEPA air filters

Air filtration devices with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters can improve indoor air quality by trapping particles, including PM2.5, and reducing their overall concentrations. Tax benefits for the cost of an air filter, cleaner or purifier are currently offered through the Government of Canada, but not a rebate for a portable HEPA air filter, which can cost $150 and up.

Using a health economics approach, Carlsten and his team, including Dr. Kate Johnson as well as statistical research scientist and lead author, PhD student Amin Adibi, created a simulation model that predicted the outcomes of a five-year HEPA filter rebate program with a start and end period of 2018 to 2022.

Amin Adibi is a PhD student with the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation at UBC.

The research team’s analysis drew from historical data on wildfire smoke and PM2.5, as well as hospitalizations due to wildfire smoke inhalation and HEPA air filter effectiveness at removing particulate matter. Researchers also consulted with patient partners living with asthma, two medical health officers, an environmental health officer and a policy analyst.

“We tried to make our model as accessible and easily transferable as possible to facilitate its application in other settings.”

The test scenario targeted all B.C. residents 42 years of age with a diagnosis of asthma and compared them with the same demographic without portable HEPA air filters in their homes. In this scenario, the B.C. provincial government offered a 100 per cent rebate on portable HEPA air filters to the test demographic. 

“We chose conservative estimates of the HEPA air filters’ effectiveness that did not include their ability to remove other indoor sources of air particulate matter, such as cooking particles, wood burning stove smoke and pathogens,” says Adibi. 

Smoke from wildfires blankets the sky in Jasper, Alberta, in 2017.

The team found that the HEPA filters could prevent more than 600 emergency room visits and 400 hospitalizations across the province. Additionally, a full rebate on the cost of a HEPA air filter was cost-effective in the Kootenay Boundary region of B.C., which was also the most wildfire-prone area under analysis within the given time frame. 

However, across the province, researchers found that a $100 rebate program on HEPA air filters was mostly cost-effective if each filter was used continuously throughout the year. A $30 rebate was cost-effective in wildfire-prone areas of B.C.’s interior and northern interior when a HEPA air filter was used only on days when PM2.5 levels exceeded 25 microns per metre squared. 

“Geographic differences were a significant factor in the cost-benefit analysis of this broad-based public health intervention,” states Carlsten. “Any intervention that shows great promise at being able to improve patient outcomes should undergo a similar process when evaluating its cost-effectiveness.” 

Researchers

Christopher Carlsten

Related Articles

Calculating how the cost of medication affects asthma patient care

Giving voice to asthma and COPD patients

Research finds encouraging trends in B.C.’s approach to severe asthma

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Email

Related Research Centres/Programs

Centre for Lung Health

Get the latest research headlines in your inbox

Subscribe

Recent News and Stories

Type
Announcement

Celebrating the life and distinguished career of Dr. Marcel Dvorak

May 14, 2025
Type
Stories

More equitable representation needed in Parkinson’s research

May 9, 2025 parkinsons, patient engagement, women
Type
Stories

Gamified stroke recovery improves arm function

May 8, 2025 stroke, rehabilitation
See more news

Get updates!

Join our newsletter mailing list to stay up to date on features and releases.

Subscribe

Quick Links

  • News and Stories
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Media Enquiries

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • YouTube

© 2025 VCHRI. All rights reserved.

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy